Have a good weekend all! I found this article this morning. Read it.
Archive Page 2
The Stock Enigma
Published March 11, 2008 Investing , Stocks , Uncategorized Leave a CommentTags: Commodity Trading, DJIA, FOREX, Stock Trading, The Economy
I’ve always found the stock market to be a bit strange, particularly when it comes to the esoteric art of “valuation.” While I’m sure that there are quite a few people out there who really understand the “real value” of a stock, it seems that the vast majority of the people who trade stocks—you know, the ones who lose all of their money—look at the charts and figure, “Hey, it’s moving up, it must be a good trade, right???”
A couple of years ago I purchased a small chunk of a company that manufactures cell phone cases called Forward Industries. I bought this stock for about $4 a share, purely because the technicals looked good (I think there was a double-dipping screaming dojo reversal pattern or something). Shortly after I bought it, it started to scream indeed; I was hoping for a two to three dollar rally, and ended up selling it a couple of weeks later for $14 a share. It topped out around $28, and, as of this writing, is now $2.39. Man, I would hate to have been the “greatest fool” in that one.
Forward Industries had released some positive news, the stock started to go up, Kramer got a hold of it, and then all hell broke loose. The result was a classic pump-and-dump, one that I was on the right side of for a change.
Stock “values” are based upon perception, not reality. If a stock doesn’t pay a dividend, the only reason to buy it is to hopefully unload it on someone later for more than you paid for it. That person, in turn, hopes the same thing. So what is the stock really worth? Well, I’ve always felt that the proof is in the pudding: If you get more money for the stock than you paid for it, you valued the stock correctly! Non-dividend paying stocks, as they exist today, have no intrinsic value. Can anyone explain why a person would choose to purchase a piece of a company and not get a corresponding piece of that company’s profits?
Imagine buying a 10% stake in a local bakery, for example. At the end of the fiscal year, your partner—who owns the other 90%–comes to you with good news: the bakery made
$100,000 profit, and they brought you your share in the form of a fat check and a dozen black-and-white cookies. You are, of course, elated when you hear this news, but you refuse the check. As you’re eating the cookies you explain to your partner that you have no interest in taking the profit proceeds, you only want to sell your 10% ownership at a profit to some guy you’ve been talking to! And guess what? He wants to do the same thing! That’s a pretty good deal for your partner, eh?
I guess this is why I’ve always liked things like commodities and the FOREX. Try as you might, you can’t present a mess of corn as anything but a mess of corn. And hey, I’m always down to trade a bunch of my worthless fiat currency for your worthless fiat currency. After all, when the DOW is sitting at 7000 next year all of that colorful foreign currency will make nice wallpaper in my little girl’s room.
![[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]](http://www.kitconet.com/charts/metals/gold/t24_au_en_usoz_2.gif)
![[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]](http://www.kitconet.com/charts/metals/silver/t24_ag_en_usoz_2.gif)